REPROGRAMMING 1ST YEAR STUDENTS: AN ACTION RESEARCH CASE STUDY

Authors

  • Nicky Danino University of Central Lancashire
  • Lesley May University of Central Lancashire
  • Nick Mitchell University of Central Lancashire

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5420/ujpr.4.

Keywords:

computing, 4WC, retention

Abstract

This paper depicts a large-scale intervention within a 1st year Computing undergraduate university cohort. The course is a full 20 credit, Level 4 module comprising of 120 1st years studying at the University of Central Lancashire (UCLan). The students are from all manner of academic backgrounds. Many have studied either Computing or IT at school or college, whilst others have not undertaken any previous or formal qualifications in the subject.

An Action Research study was organised and the content of the first module was redesigned to take students through a challenging (yet highly-scaffolded) project during the first four teaching weeks. This acted as an introduction to university life and the course in general. The rest of the modules followed on after this initial module finished, and was delivered in the more traditional long and thin mode.

The motivation for this study was to improve the student experience generally – whilst specifically targeting issues surrounding student engagement and retention in the 1st year. Additional aims were also to help students make the transition from school to University so that they will be better prepared to enter the 2nd year of their degree. Delivering the first module as a block enabled a small team of staff to work closely with students, building strong relationships at the start of their degree. This meant that students could be carefully monitored and supported at this crucial time.

The implementation of the 4WC has shown an improvement in student marks and student retention. The response to this intervention has shown that students have been enthused by the early results and are clearer about what they are going to study in depth later on. Consequently, students are more committed to the course, and retention rates have improved quite dramatically. In addition, students should be able to make better-informed choices about their future course options, having had exposure to the products on some of the different courses.

Author Biographies

  • Nicky Danino, University of Central Lancashire
    School of Computing Engineering & Physical Sciences
  • Lesley May, University of Central Lancashire
    School of Computing Engineering & Physical Sciences
  • Nick Mitchell, University of Central Lancashire
    School of Computing Engineering & Physical Sciences

Downloads

Published

2013-07-15

Issue

Vol. 4 (2013)

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

  4. A copy of all published submissions will be archived on the University of Cnetral Lancashire Research Repository - CLoK, preserved, managed and disseminated according to CLoK policies (See CLoK policies)